Mercury & fish: Why does the debate go on?
Author: Lisa Frack
Website: http://www.enviroblog.org/2009/04/mercury-fish-why-does-the-…
Special to Enviroblog by Sonya Lunder, EWG Senior Analyst.
The topic of mercury and fish is once again in the news. This time it was prompted by public comments submitted to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) about its controversial (hurry-up-and-get-it-out-before-George-leaves) mercury report, which largely concludes that the toxic effects of mercury in fish are mostly overcome by the beneficial fats in fish. Here at EWG an eyebrow or two (OK, more than that) were raised when these “findings” were released.

The problem with FDA’s guidance? Bad science
FDA’s new guidance is based on a fatally flawed model leaked last fall that was blasted by mercury experts at the Environmental Protection Agency - who cautioned against releasing it, citing scientific flaws and inadequacies.
The current draft, released minutes before the Inauguration, has slightly less outrageous language, but the basic findings remain the same. Recent public comments submitted by EWG, scientists and…
(Read the rest of this article at the following article source link for the full story)
For more information click the following article source link for the full story:
http://www.enviroblog.org/2009/04/mercury-fish-why-does-the-…



